SACD’s technical advantages, high resolution, dynamic range, and low noise. All that being written, the dilemma, SACD vs. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I chose Mono because these titles interested me the most. When I got my better audio system I bought a dedicated two channel Sony SCD-1 player. It’s appalling the crap they’re releasing to kids these days…As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. . I may have to compare the SHM-SACD or other CD versions to this SACD to see if it improves at all on those. Updated on January 6, 2021 Although pre-recorded CDs have lost luster with the convenience of digital music streaming and downloads, the CD started the digital music. swanlee, Dec 8, 2012. SACD vs. 45 RPM 200 Gram Clarity Vinyl. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. DVD-Audio vs Vinyl vs. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. . SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. A lot of pops and crackles ("a lot" for a brand new MFSL vinyl, I mean) on the. I have to disagree with the positive remarks of the SACD's. I don't know which is more truthful. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by rpd, Dec 11, 2003. Or sign in with one of these services. Native DSD64 (SACD) is better still and DSD128 recordings are amazingly good. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. This album can sound really good. 10/disc royalty for CDs. Team Value-Fi. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. 02. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. #6. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. I have the five Steve Wilson blu-ray audio 5. • The first international release of the recording on Hybrid SACDs, allowing listeners to hear the enhanced resolution of these new transfers and playable on all CD players • The first and only complete Wagner Ring cycle available in Dolby Atmos Channel separation. 192 is significantly better and DXD (352) is even better. Oh yeah, Aimee Mann and Vanessa Fernandez too, that would be the newest. . SACD vs. A vinyl record vs a SACD is very very close. . The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired sonic attributes. for making the SACD version, and instead they CHOSE James Guthrie, who was an engineer producing, e. No other version other than their double 45 rpm vinyl (also mediocre) sounds like this. Yes. I like Analogue Productions' work, so it should be interesting to hear how they sound. SACD players have a 8 to 10 second delay as they switch layers and the mastering can be different on different layers, even on the same hybrid SACD. label will be coming to hybrid stereo SACD (playable on all CD players) as well as to audiophile-standard UltraDisc One-Step 180-gram, 45 RPM vinyl. For comparison of the 2022 SACD and vinyl: I have to do it again with all releases. ”. SACD vs VINYL. #4. All we need here is a study showing listeners preferred the 24/192 version of an album over its 16/44 counterpart in a rigorous study. New media New comments Browse Albums Search media. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I voted 'Who Cares. Head Gear. SACD vs. 98: Whitney Houston / Whitney. After purchasing The Cars S/T, Candy-O, and Shake It Up on MFSL vinyl, here are my thoughts. On the other hand, Vinyl records have a larger dynamic range than SACDs, which means that they can accurately reproduce louder and softer sounds. Both sound great but I only want to keep one. SACD Players SACD stands for Super Audio CD. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. The recording/tracking ability of vinyl is easily at least 50 kHz and perhaps as high as 100 kHz. Music; Vinyl Records; 45 RPM Vinyl Record; Fleetwood Mac - Rumours. . SACD vs. Whether is was done 15-20-30 years ago or today. SACD has given me some great listening moments. 112 posts total. Voted Vinyl. Steely Dan-Cant Buy A Thrill-Hybrid Stereo SACD|Acoustic Sounds. Also, do you think SACD has good future in the massive market? I also posted this thread in the "digital" seecion, sorry about that but some people only enter to this section. The SACD is definitely much more forward and vivid across the board, with ringing steel strings and a real bite to the violin. More sharing options. Hendersonville, Tennessee Home of Cash & Orbison. Vinyl. CD vs. One example is excess Volume Compression in modern music. Vinyl. Tell me what you think, do you prefer SACD's or Vinyls because they sound the same to me, only you get the 5. SACD vs. Virtual. The vinyl is top notch too. But the more I listen the more I enjoy music, tint and all. The album was developed from a collection of unrelated. Today, the world has moved on to multi-bit PCM. At all. SACD or BluRay or good old fashioned CD's will never have the back catalog that vinyl has if your willing to dig through the crates. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. The authors aren’t saying that high-res digital might sound a little different from Red Book CD but is no better. Even an SACD only disk that’s just a SACD copy of the same CD master is not likely going to deliver a whole lot. While the standard CD format is tied to a 44. As for a good sacd,the one recording i really is by Roger Waters "in the flesh - live". Madman Across the Water SACD vs CD vs LP. I grew up in the analogue days (vinyl and tape) so tape hiss is to be expected on recordings. . DeTurk quickly added, "The vinyl's sound always destroys the peak-limited, 16-bit CD version, it kills it dead. IMHO. New Jersey, USA. " The album topped the Billboard chart for a week, and remained on the chart for 741 weeks from 1973 to 1988. . Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Forums. I will add this is one album I prefer listening to on CD (the MFSL release) or especially SACD vs vinyl so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I live near a JVC distributor and have access to many of the titles. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. But CDs are fine. I decided to include CD quality as well – and a couple other comparisons thrown in for good measure. I want the best sound. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. 5 manual RCM then queued up one track at a time. vinyl is a "fun" sort of dilemma to have! Tim, May 21, 2009 #51. Although this recording was digital, the Parsons 2017 remaster actually sounds more analogue than the original cd. Singles 1969-1973 has a re-record or two, a little remixing, and other touches. The world's largest online retailer of high-end audio, audiophile music, and accessories. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. The band did NOT like it at all. Virtual Systems Let the world see what you've built. DSD vs SACD vs Vinyl Whenever I look for an older album or artist, seemingly WITHOUT FAIL they are not available as a DSD download. On the other hand digital has advantages in terms of low noise, low distortion etc so if you value that more, go for the SACD. Sorry about my bad English. Warner Music [Sony Music outside Europe] today announced the upcoming release of Pink Floyd’s ‘Animals’ on Deluxe Gatefold, CD, LP, Blu-ray and SACD. The category "Outstanding" doesn't mean audiophile sound, but outstanding quality compared to original pressings. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. Location: United States. SACD. I don't know which is more truthful. DSD recordings have a wonderful sampling rate and are sensationally good. The thing that I found most interesting when reviewing the first-time LP record pressing of George Harrison’s 1992 live album — called simply Live In Japan — was not the high quality, dark black, perfectly. Both formats have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, so it can be tough to decide which one is right for you. A Secret Lab. 4) Making Movies - muted, no drum slam, muted highs. I still prefer vinyl, but I simply do not listen to CD's any more the digital fatigue compared to the SACD's is just too. November 4th for CBAT. 10/disc royalty for CDs. Moody Blues "Question of bal. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Visit Homepage . - John SunierMoody Blues "Question of bal. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. The dynamic range of vinyl is about 75dB, CD is 96dB, SACD is 120dB, and the human ear picks up 130dB. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. Note the word “indistinguishable. Headquartered in Salina, Kansas, Acoustic Sounds, Inc. Even the UBP-X700 (cheaper) does SACD. Analog sources- CD vs. Just trust your ears, as I do mine. If. Dynamics are out of this world. Thank you. Often times, the. Many audiophiles choose to embrace both formats, recognizing that each. The initial presentation changed from relatively mechanical to one with atmosphere and naturalness. MikeT, Nov 3, 2019. In other words it needs some work to breath. During the summer I don't get much seat time in front of the stereo so it might be a week or more before my next chance. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. To finish with the digital versions, the version in 360 (RA) Reality Audio brings a great rendering. I would be interested to hear what you guys think as well!Maybe I should have included the current MOFI SACD & vinyl. . I have to say that 3 songs into the SACD I shut it off and went back to the vinyl. If that makes sense. Posted April 21, 2010. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of Rage. SACD Players SACD stands for Super Audio CD. Never the SACD player as a SACD player vs a dedicated CD player with the same SACD hybrid disc. I can hear the difference between CD and vinyl, and between CD quality and high-def audio. One is the MFSL version which I loved. True. Slight increase in frequency range and they also have a lot more features on the Blu-ray disc that are fun to play with. $750. Perfect music with one of Mozart’s greatest interpreters with the greatest orchestra. It is a high-resolution digital. Boy, what a difference. "No matter how high a sampling rate is," Wired's. On the other hand digital has advantages in terms of low noise, low distortion etc so if you value that more,. S. I much prefer CD to SACD. deeper, wider sound field. 98: Grateful Dead / Workingman's Dead Hybrid Stereo SACD Numbered Limited Edition CMOB 2137 SA Original Price: $29. The SACD versions bring the best of the digital versions with the MOFI SACD followed by the 1999 SACD. The SACD I found is always better, that’s if you have the right SACD player like the DMP. Every time. Given the same mastering, vinyl is still better than redbook. New items New comments Author list Series Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews. Fleetwood Mac - Rumours - 45 RPM Vinyl Record. for making the SACD version, and instead they CHOSE James Guthrie, who was an engineer producing, e. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. The gap. Again, though, the Blu-Spec CD sounded better than the regular CD - just a bit more fuller, more definition and tighter bass and treble extension over the CD. Get either the target Morrison Hotel CD or the Audio Fidelity. 1:17 - Stereo CD Layer4. Examples: AcousticSounds offers 1,614 titles on SACD and 28,670 on vinyl. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. Anyway, my sense is that good vinyl and good SACD are probably comparable but there are a lot of other variables such as quality of the music system etc. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on. Vinyl is an analog storage medium, which means there is a physical record of the music imprinted. In fact, it's a good sign that the music isn't overly compressed. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me. he worst is shelling out $25 or $30 for either and after a long search and sometimes a long wait for import or re-pressing, the thing sounds. This first example compares MoFi' s Music From Big Pink - LP vs. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Hi commsysman. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Boy, what a difference. g. Dec 10, 2005. Rolling Stone ranked them No. 49:Personally I am fine with well mastered hi res digital. . We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If the OP wastes money on those with no SACD player, then he wastes money. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. 0:00 - LP2. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". 112 posts total. Today I compared it with the 2003 SACD. . The SACD features the 2018 remix of the iconic 1977 Pink Floyd album for the first time, by long-time producer/engineer James Guthrie. It's about the music you like. The vocals are real, the acoustic guitars are EQ'd perfectly. Pacific 2 SE -> Ayon Crossfire III or Circle Labs A100 -> Avantgarde Acoustic Trio LE 26 with 4x REL Carbon Special ,SACD Player: Audio Aero La Fontaine Analog : Transrotor Fat Bob S. Seems like for PG3 one should definitely get Classic Records Vinyl, for PG1 SACD gets closer to vinyl, but still the vinyl has upper hand. Hello everybody. They also don’t degrade with each playback, unlike analog records. Whereas some others where I am pretty familiar with it's vinyl 'equivalent' I could tell even without direct comparison that the vinyl was better, like Kind of Blue for example. In the vinyl vs. There isn't an answer as to what sounds better it really is just personal preference. Today we are proud to announce a brand. I've heard many great sounding redbook cd's and I've heard some horrible vinyl. of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. On the other hand, vinyl’s sound stage remains unbeaten, as the ClearAudio parallel arm. By AJ Wykes • June 22, 2023 These days the vast majority of the music we experience is stored digitally. To finish with the digital versions, the version in 360 (RA) Reality Audio brings a great rendering in 7. One is the MFSL version which I loved. The world's largest high-end audio community. I don't know which is more truthful. Joined Mar. Thankfully my vinyl copy of that album is pristine. The Super Audio Compact Disc format was. I noted underneath your review of the box set that the new SHM-SACD was a flat transfer from the analogue master. Most noticeable is a good front-to-back soundstage and to a lesser extent better timbre. 1 layer is very good, but the SACD layer has smoother high frequencies (violins, oboe) and better transient attack (tympani). The latest in this long history is a double-blind test that, the authors conclude, demonstrates that 44. The SACD is definitely much more forward and vivid across the board, with ringing steel strings and a real bite to the violin. Thread starter mosttoysrk; Start date Sep 25, 2007; Help Support MartinLogan Audio Owners Forum:. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Sex Lies And Master Tapes, Sep 16, 2022. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Maybe no better overall than any other version. Quote: Originally Posted by FenderP To me, it's not about formats. Please, bear in mind that I have NO original vinyls to compare to, only the early CDs of Shake It Up and Greatest Hits: 1) Shake It Up - the worse pressing from the three. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. KevinP, May 21, 2009 #52. Vinyl. 1 option. but really no. Even better than the regular SACD with even clearer presentation. 1/96/192 has little audible effect, ever hear a 20k test tone? The whole resolution. Maybe but so far my experience with mofi's SACD vs vinyl has not been good for SACS. Also, I know that SACD didn't really catch on, but I see. My buddy and I compared Tidal's "Moving Pictures" to the vinyl reissue. Vinyl vs SACD. All great stuff and this combined with the revitalized vinyl market bodes well for my enjoyment of music at home and is a much brighter picture than I saw when the future of audio seemed only CD and compressed. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I would think that the Vinyl will sound better than the standard CD. Submitted by Irwin on Sun, 2015-04-26 01:07 . SACD vs. The sound of the two versions is similar. IMHO. Often times, the differences can seem quite small upon initial comparison, for example, the Beatles remasters in 24 bit vs. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. They pretty much mirror each other in my opinion. MusicDirect offers 140 titles on SACD and another 20 or so. What do you think about SACD vs Vinyl in sound terms? I know it has been deiscussed but if you feel like answer me now after some years after its. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Decca’s landmark recording of Wagner’s 15-hour epic, Der Ring des Nibelungen conducted by Sir Georg Solti is the most celebrated classical recording in history. I own this one along with the 1997 re-issue and a 35DP-62 Japan for US. Roxanne Joncas Soundstage determines the stereo image width you perceive between the speakers. The vinyl has a noise rise and a peak around 30 kHz. Redbook back in the day. I can see how people still prefer vinyl over any other digital format, but this is most likely more subjective (vinyl has a special sound which is nice, no doubt). This gives SACD a very distinct improvement in transient response. Vinyl: SACD offers digital precision, while vinyl provides analog warmth and character. They compared the two channel mix. Todd68, Jun 30, 2019. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. Mirror Image, Sep 16, 2022. Video and Audio Formats on Plastic – Part 3 is an introduction to audio formats on CD, SACD, DVD, DVDA and Blu-Ray. 6%. #2. . Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. Just my $0. Vinyl depends on a mechanically driven system, and any such system will introduce minute changes in the speed and pitch of playback. There's no real difference between the sound characteristics of vinyl, SACD or CD. No change in data , no change in sound , simple as that. Mobile Fidelity Gold CD 1988. SACD vs. culabula, May 3, 2020 #11. One of the benefits of SACD is the dead quiet background. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. It plays PCM and may not do high res. I had some old albums I wanted to play, so I blew the dust off my 35 year old TT and fired that mut. This is really about "The Downward Spiral" re-release. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. OTOH, there are many recordings from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that are of poor sound quality. The vinyl reissues of this title (box set and standalone) are revelatory. Not that the SACD doesn't sound really good. For 11 years, I’ve enjoyed a Puccini + U-clock to spin CDs and (especially) SACDs. In the world of high-fidelity audio, two formats have stood the test of time and continue to captivate audiophiles: SACD (Super Audio CD) and vinyl records. The authors aren’t saying that high-res digital might sound a little different from Red Book CD but is no better. Certainly better than 3 or 4 other vinyl versions I have owned over the years. Im just wondering when? Menu. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. New posts Search forums. Technically, it's more an aesthetic choice or trying to be louder than the other band on the street. All Activity; My Activity Streams . Likewise whichever has the edge in your playback system will be superior to the. Recent MoFi controversy spurred me to compare sound of MoFi Vinyl to CD, SACD to CD, DSD to FLAC. Tiny imperfections in the belts or wheels of the turntable will cause more. Vinyl can sound utterly amazing at first but eventually you will wear out a record. Availability: In Stock. I've noticed a surfeit in the cost and availability of SACD's - prices are really cheap for some top notch music, often recorded in Europe with the cost for many disks below $12- with shipping no less! I'm in the process of digitizing my vinyl along with ripping hundreds of CD's to my Mac, but I also like playing. Get the DCC Gold CD of the Platinum-SHM mastering. I don't know which is more truthful. DVD-Audio/SACD vs Vinyl sound quality? Discussion in ' Music Corner ' started by Vinophile, May 22, 2006 . SHM-SACD vs original CD (WB), vs original vinyl (WB) I first cleaned each vinyl LP on my NG 1. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Vinyl. Los Angeles, CA. Search Head Gear. But most of us here are comfortable and familiar with it. . Also note that the CD vs Vinyl, or Digital vs Analog is a pointless debate because it is not the format that compromises music, it is the content. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. The vinyl was much better. Vinyl. 1447) Join Date Dec 2011 Location Tynemouth, England Posts 2,457 Mentioned 43 Post(s)SACD vs. That old mix was reissued on SACD by Audio Fidelity in 2015, and then it was issued again on Blu-Ray by Rhino in 2017. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Hi-res digital audio vs sacd I've got a pretty good setup for vinyl and digital audio files, but I have an opportunity to get a "minty" 10-yr old audiophile-grade CD/SACD player for $350. With a storage capacity of 4. Vinyl. 8224 MHz (64 times that of CD) Bit Depth: 1-bit (compared to CD’s 16-bit) Channels: Multi-channel (up to 6) and stereo Storage Capacity: Typically 4. well i'd say you have to take it on a title by title basis with SACD, as with any medium source and mastering are key. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and only have about 25-30SACD recordings now although I plan to order a lot more as more and more reissues come out. In my opinion Vinyl, SACD and DVD-A are all of sufficiently high resolution that, assuming comparitive quality playback and media, the recording and transfer / mastering is going to be making the differences between which will deliver superior sound quality. It has long been believed that the human ear cannot hear frequencies above 22 kHz. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. After an extensive shoot-out lasting 53 hours, I'm. . Quote: Originally Posted by regal The sampling rate 44. The SHM CD would have an edge over standard CD but would not surpass Vinyl and SACD, DVD-A if the pressing is mastered properly. There is some technology that JVC uses to make the. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". The MoFi absolutely kills the Sony. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. Record labels. . . 4. I'm a pretty big NIN fan, so price isn't a problem, I'm just wondering if the Vinyl player would be higher quality than the SACD Deluxe Version. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. That leaves Soft Parade which also was released by Audio Fidelity. I own the SHM-CDs of all the early Steely Dan albums ( Can't Buy A Trill through Gaucho) and I'm more than pleased with the fidelity of these issues. )I don't have the SACD (it's too expensive and I'm only capable of stereo). The choice between the two depends on personal preferences and the desired. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. There are more albums where I compared against a standard CD. By all means, get the 4 DCC's. I wrote I was somewhat pleased with the mastering. but for every song, the DR value is "one less" on the SACD vs CD. Home. So - the SACD ain't the original, but it's a much better option than anything on vinyl except the MoFi vinyl issue. SHM-SACD vs Original LP/Original LP-rip, Original CD and other reissues. In. So I did. DACs sound different because different DACs apply different filters to the input data and have different methods of producing the analogue signal, even if every DAC used the same chip each DAC's analogue output stage is different. The title best known is Miles/Blue. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Other than that, the DSD bit stream should be exactly the same for the SACD part. Every time. . I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. although I get the impression they just don’t put the same effort into the SACD release. But the dramatic difference occurs in vinyl. The vinyl appears to be analogue mastered so if you value an all-analogue chain that would be an advantage. You will enjoy the contrast and comparison.